A new report shows that EU Delegations lack transparency and predictability in handling call for proposals, which creates barriers for CSOs to access EC funding.

(Brussels, 25/07/2012) A new monitoring report of deconcentration of external aid management towards the EU’s overseas Delegations in developing countries was published today by CONCORD, the European confederation of Relief and Development NGOs. It provides a useful insight into the evolving relationships between EU Delegations and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs).

Transparency and predictability are serious concerns

“There’s a real need for EU Delegations to ensure maximum predictability, transparency and accountability in the programming, selection and award of funds processes.”

A way to this would be for example to ensure timely and systematic consultation with CSOs in EC programmes plan¬ning; to standardly use the restricted procedure for all calls for proposals; and to give a comprehensive feedback on the reasons why a proposal was rejected. This would take out some of the mystery around how to access EC funding” Says Nils Rocklin from CONCORD member Handicap International.

Efficiency of EU Delegations’ work with CSOs in the field can be improved

“CSOs are still detracted from their main purpose of delivering development aid by an excessive administrative burden and serious delays in grant management issues by EU Delegations. This is increased by the inconsistency and restrictive approach to the interpretation of the Standard Contract requirements by Delegation staff. The EC should develop a “Code of Good Practice” to provide a consistent interpretation and encourage flexibility wherever it brings simplification.” Says Nils Rocklin from CONCORD member Handicap International.

ENDS

Press contact: Daniel Puglisi, Communications Officer : +32 2 743 87 77 daniel.puglisi(at)concordeurope.org